A CONTROVERSIAL bid to use lakes for fishing will go to appeal after it was refused by a council.

The gravel pits in Hall Road, Heybridge, have had plans submitted several times to turn them into a fishing lake by applicant Jim Purdy.

After another refusal from Maldon District Council, the application is now going through an appeal process.

The report for the refusal said: “The information which has been submitted as part of the application fails to demonstrate that the proposal would not have a direct, adverse effect on the interest features of the local, national and European designated sites at and within the vicinity of the site and protected species.

“The development proposal cannot be deemed necessary for reasons of overriding public interest.

“The proposal would result in harm to the character and appearance of the area through a loss of vegetation and the increased provision and formalisation of the car parking area required.

“The car parking proposed on site is considered to be insufficient, failing to accommodate the demand generated by the proposed use of the site, which in turn will lead to cars parking within Battle Rise and adjoining streets causing conditions of obstruction, congestion and inconvenience to other road users.”

The initial proposal in 2016 wanted to see 60 fishing platforms constructed and 54 “swims” created.

However, the plans fell through after more than 200 letters of objection from residents and environmental groups.

Mr Purdy’s agent, Peter Le Grys, said: “Fishing is a quiet and peaceful sport that can sit alongside the nature conservation interests of the area without causing harm.

“In fact, the presence of the fishermen and a bailiff will assist in preventing anti-social problems that have unfortunately been prevalent in this isolated location.

“The use of the lakes and the provision of a small car parking area will not otherwise cause any impact upon the character and amenity of the area, while enabling more people to enjoy its benefits.

“The concerns of the council are non-existent and based on no substantive or credible case.”

The deadline to submit comments is July 11.