HOLY intervention into the debate over the proposed Bradwell windfarm was claimed by two opposing factions at a public inquiry.

The inquiry into Npower Renewables' plans to construct ten 121m turbines on land at Hockley Farm, Bradwell, opened on Tuesday, June 5.

In his opening evidence David Hardy, advocate for Npower Renewables, said the Othona Community - a Christian settlement near the proposed site - had expressed written approval of the ten turbines.

However, Geoffrey Sinclair, giving evidence for the windfarm's main opponents Battle (Bradwell and Tillingham Tackling Lost Environment), claimed the written support of the Bishops of Bradwell, Chelmsford and Brentwood in Battle's fight against the scheme.

Meanwhile, Simon Randle, representing Maldon District Council, which originally rejected Npower Renewables' plans, said windpower as a tool to deal with climate change was "to be applauded" - but not at any cost.

Later in the day, Clive Tokley, for the council, was cross examined by Mr Hardy and said in his opinion the most important aspect in Bradwell's case was the protection of St Peter's Chapel.

Mr Hardy said windfarms were bound to have a visual impact "but that isn't sufficient for non-compliance".

When questioned by council advocate Simon Randle about the appropriate siting of windfarms, Mr Tokely said: "The benefits do not outweigh the harm."

The windfarm inquiry is due to sit for ten days.

The proceedings will take place mainly at Maldon District Council offices in Princes Road, Maldon, but planning inspector Philip Major agreed the hearing should be held at Southend Airport on June 12 and 13 to hear aviation evidence against the development.

* For a full report on the Bradwell Wind Farm planning inquiry, see next week's Maldon and Burnham Standard