Builders find artefacts dating to 14th century in Colchester pub (From Maldon and Burnham Standard)
Get involved: send your pictures, video, news and views by texting MBS to 80360 or you can e-mail us Click here for
details »
Builders find artefacts dating to 14th century in Colchester pub
7:00pm Tuesday 10th July 2012 in North Essex By Caroline Tilley
COLCHESTER’S oldest pub is getting a new lease of life.
The former Stockwell Arms, in West Stockwell Street, has been undergoing renovations since 2010, with a new building due to be created at the back of the site imminently.
Owner Robert Morgan is spending £1million to bring the historic pub back to life as a family restaurant with real ale.
Although still a building site, it is hoped the Stockwell, as it will be called, will open in October.
The floors are currently soil, the windows and back of the building have to be boarded up every night and the only access to part of the upstairs is from a ladder.
For Mr Morgan, the project has been a labour of love and filled with discoveries.
When he first bought the pub in 2010, he was not sure what to expect.
He and builders put cameras into the ceilings and floorboards and discovered original beams, floors and ceilings dating back to the 14th century, when it was first built.
Mr Morgan, of Little Cornard, Suffolk, said: “I forget how derelict it was.
“It’s hard to not have enthusiasm for continuing.
“Everything you find comes back and pays you off when you find a Georgian coin or an aspect of the building.
“When the builders start to do the modern building, it won’t be half as much fun.”
As well as finding a devil’s tail ceiling and the original wattle and daub walls, Mr Morgan has discovered smaller treasures in the floorboards.
So far, Victorian and Georgian coins have been unearthed and even two dating back to the reign of Edward III from sometime between 1327 and 1377.
Mr Morgan is hoping to get the two dated more accurately in the hope it could give the Stockwell a more accurate date for when it was built.
Currently historians have dated the site back to 1360, but Mr Morgan believes it was built before 1350.
A marrow spoon, buckles and an archer’s ring have also been found under the building.
Some of the best discoveries, however, have come from the Stockwell itself.
A medieval archway dating from the 14th century has been discovered, as has a medieval angel defaced by the reformation and two inglenook fireplaces, all of which will remain on show.
Mr Morgan wants to keep as much of the building accessible to customers as possible and wants to reassure them work at the Stockwell is ongoing.
He said: “Lots of people come by, saying we aren’t making any progress.
“For the last five months we have had nothing but rain and it’s stopping us plastering the outside of the building.
“It needs five days to set. As soon as we get that weather break, it will be going on.”
Plans are already being made for the Stockwell’s grand opening, which will hopefully go ahead in October.
Mr Morgan said the pub would create around 26 to 34 new jobs.
Comments(13)
DavidGLee
says...
12:17am Wed 11 Jul 12
TheCaptain
says...
9:09am Wed 11 Jul 12
sandgronun64
says...
10:25am Wed 11 Jul 12
What about the real story behind all the delays? Conversations with the local residents and council officers, suggest other reasons as to why the opening date keeps being put back. Despite a huge lobby throughout the planning application, from local residents, archaeologists, and the Dutch Quarter (Residents) Association, concerning the proposed extension (that will now occupy twice the building's current footprint), the owner (apparently) refused to consult with neighbours from surrounding properties. Instead he simply announced his intentions (via the planning office) and when contacted, dismissed their concerns. I understand that the council have even reviewed their planning procedures since then as a direct result of this application.
Apparently the owner is on their third set of architects, and has yet to resolve fundamental aspects of the intended building works. The local community surrounding it has not been properly engaged and is (I am led to believe) unhappy with the whole thing. Simply pointing out a few archaeological finds does not explain the true nature of these continued delays.
When oh when, will the Gazette stop writing these glorified adverts, and start doing a bit of real, investigative journalism?
Bhudeeka
says...
12:41pm Thu 12 Jul 12
sandgronun64
says...
1:21pm Thu 12 Jul 12
historyman22
says...
3:17pm Thu 12 Jul 12
It seems like this job is a done deal though. Pity as I would love to hear the opinions of residents directly. Perhaps they don't know about this voice though?
The REAL Norm
says...
4:42pm Thu 12 Jul 12
Bhudeeka wrote:no you be quiet bhudeeka because what is it with accusing people of mouthing off and then not saying who you are and why youre supporting this so much and really not using enough punctuation and grammar in your ramblings so I get a headache reading them and everything so take your ire and shove off somewhere else
do be quiet sandgronun64 people like you dont object to constant housing developments but mouth off at wonderful things such as this I totally agree with lollardknight, David Glee and the Captain so take your sour grapes somwhere else sandgronun
Please reply, I'm sure it would be fascinating...
jut1972
says...
6:25pm Thu 12 Jul 12
Red Tape
says...
9:49am Fri 13 Jul 12
sandgronun64
says...
9:52am Fri 13 Jul 12
From what I remember, residents were glad when the building was sold initially. It seems however, that it isn't the renovation of the historic building itself that has caused the major problem, but the large new build extension that is due to be built; one that in itself is far larger than the existing site, more than doubling the footprint and size of the enterprise. Don't take my word for the strength of feelings against it though. Go to Colchester Council's Planning Application web pages and the whole application, including objections is there. This is then a matter of fact, not simply opinion. It does of course bring me back to my original question however, as to why the wishes of the people that actually live in the area are not seen as newsworthy, whereas the production of a two page advert is?
No doubt I will be slated once again for 'daring' to ask a question. For the record, I am a local, living in the Dutch Quarter, where this building resides. I have a period property, but care deeply about not only about the property but about the fabric of the community within which I reside.
reevesiejnr
says...
1:22pm Mon 16 Jul 12
romantic
says...
12:28pm Tue 17 Jul 12
The term "family restaurant" always makes me shudder. However noble their efforts, I fear it will end up with chicken nuggets and chips, because that´s all the little darlings will eat!
He really should try to communicate with the residents, or he will no doubt end up with frequent complaints about noise, cooking smell etc.
Í´ve spent many hours in the Stockwell Arms over the years, and hope it will succeed - but talk to the neighbours and listen to what they have to say, or they´ll make your life hell!
lollardknight says...
9:50pm Tue 10 Jul 12